McCann PJ Inspectors Accused

In the verdict read today, two PJ inspectors were accused, António Nunes Cardoso to document forgery and Gonçalo Amaral for simple false testimony, he was acquitted in relation to the crime of omission of denunciation of the aggressions suffered by Leonor Cipriano. The other three arguidos [defendants] were absolved of the crime of torture.

It wasn't proved who ordered the aggressions to Leonor Cipriano in 2004.

Gonçalo Amaral was sentenced to one year and six months of suspended sentence, and António Nunes Cardoso to two years and six months of suspended sentence also.

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/05/cirpriano-casepj-inspectors-accused-at.html

According to Amaral's view of the evidence, Madeleine McCann was killed in the apartment, and knowing that, the parents are implicated in the crime.

What is puzzling is the way the evidence points to the McCann parents, together with the obstacles to police investigation, and the immediate preparedness for a British-led campaign. The McCann parents were clearly acting on insider's advice from that moment onward.

And yet, no firm proof (even with discovery of a body, I doubt) that it was the McCann parents: There should be more, surely, even now. One fingerprint on the window: Someone else may have removed the body through the back door, and placed Kate's fingerprints on the window. Even the car evidence could be a frame, could it not? They may or may not have discovered their child dead. Someone in the Tapas9 could well know more, with sinister connections.

The accusations aimed at Gonzales Amacal appear to be a frame too, and linked to McCann's case. That's obvious. It may not be because of something Amacal knows and withholds, but simply because he doesn't say the parents killed Madeleine, merely that she died in the apartment and they know it.
More details of the trial procedure are needed in order to see what has happened today. I am mightily suprised at this. With what evidence has complicity by Amacal & co has been upheld?

Quite a number of people who point to political conspiracies, implicate the Queen of Britain, along with her position as a head of Freemasonry in Britain, but I suggest that's not so. Freemasons may well be involved, certainly.

Two years ago it was, I think, the Queen spoke obliquely to the effect that, 'we are living and dark times'. That's not referring to threats from abroad, jihadism or outrage at interference in sovereign lands by our forces, nor to the usual corruption within politics, or manipulations by media establishments. It refers, i understand, to the almost complete corruption of out political system from outside, whereby we cannot easily pursue the truth, to the detriment of the fabric of society. One glaring indication is the ongoing British Intelligence clean up, directed from the Palace, stretching to America, involving the massive fraud of the Settlements money and the financiaL crisis,   perpetrated by the Blair-Bush cabal. See http://www.worldreports.org/news/179_blair_has_rolled_over_to_avoid_arrest_and_jail

Inconsistent Defence

"The Interview that Rita Jordão, a SIC corresponding journalist in London, carried out with the McCann couple, and which the station broadcast in May 2009, seems to have been yet another opportunity for the desperate and inconsistent defence of two issues, that are, in practical terms, indefensible: firstly, that Madeleine is alive, and secondly, that she only hasn’t been found yet because of a blockage that results from the propagation of Gonçalo Amaral’s theory, which apart from insisting that the little girl is dead, insists on the fact that the parents know that and, eventually, concealed the cadaver."

~ Paulo Sargento (1)

Assertion without Evidence
We are informed, according to K.McCann, the abductor was a man - 'someone's son'.. or whatever.
Useful information? I heard somewhere, on www.joana-morais.blogspot.com perhaps, that the majority of child traffickers are women. Not all though, so the stereotype would fit. A weak assertion of abduction without evidence: The 'twins beleive Madeleine was taken':

It was Tony Blair (ex-British PM) who introduced the infection of affected speech 'you know..' to preface every assertion we were supposed to swallow as gospel truth. The McCanns have that infection, (use it perhaps 100 times - not counted), but to be fair so do many Labour party supporters, in their waffle.

Evasive answers:
Q. Why does he (Amacal) not want to find Madeleine?
A. He's certainly not doing anything about it (We are). And, Mr McCann again: Amacal's theories 'are not backed up by any evidence whatsoever'.
A medical doctor is supposed to be able to weigh scientific evidence. This blank rejection of seriously strong evidence, reminiscent of doctors defending cigarrette manufacturers. But, in any case, Amacal's theories are 'ridiculous', according to McCann. I can only suppose that's because law enforcement agents are to believe that parents never tragically injure their children, in spite of any prior cases to the contrary.

According to Mr McCann the only downside to visiting Pria da Luz again this year for publicity and a spoof re-construction of events of that fateful night two years earlier, was the media frenzy, otherwise they have a lot of friends there - even ex-pats, and so it should have been an even better time. That evades the truth of their unwelcome reception there, and the reasons for that.

My conclusion
I do not think all the questions were prepared in advance, and so answers are interesting. The McCanns weren't appearing with a serious public appeal, or merely to update us on their interesting lives, but waffled in a style I recognise: damage limitation. I suspect Mitchell, spokesperson and ex-Labour Party PR employee and now spokesperson for the McCann's, grooms the McCann's not on their behalf, but on behalf of the whole corrupt Labour party leadership and their coterie. The McCann's are under their thumb.

An terrible alternative scenario, a political conspiracy theory, as to the truth of the matter: the child died in the apartment. The McCann's are innocent of that, being used and framed (eventually) by a bent Labour Party leadership. One amongst their number, or an accomplice to that party, killed the child and hid the body. This, at the time of the upcoming Lisbon Treaty.
Worth considering, for all it's worth. The interference of the Labour Party leadership in a judicial matter is more than worrying, and included direct intervention by Gordon Brown. The consequences of that interference led to an abrupt end to police enquiries and prosecution of the case, and remains to be explained. Answers to questions put to that leadership by the police, should be sought.

(1) Paulo Sargento is a Psychologist in Portugal, and anlyses various discourses concerned with the case.
His full analyis in full, 'The McCanns’ interview to SIC: Fallacies and more Fallacies or the antechamber to the Swan Song?' can be found here on Joana Morais' informative blog. Gonçalo Amaral was the leading Portuguese detective following Madeleine McCanne's dissapearance.

Attendance at Deaths

According to the McCann family, detectives asked why a British-trained dog detected traces of a corpse on Mrs McCann’s clothing, a Bible in the apartment, and when it approached their hire car. Reports also claim that is discovered the scent on the vehicle’s key fob,and Madeleine's toy cat Mrs McCann, a former GP, has said she was present at six deaths before her holiday. Doctors are called to certify death on occasions. Typically This does not occur very often. The patient is an elderly person in a residential or nursing home. A doctor has to check for a heartbeat, respiration, and whether the pupils react when a pen torch is shone into the eyes. At least one doctor finds the claim that Mrs McCann attended six deaths, shortly before the her holiday, difficult to believe. People tend to die on hospital wards, and when a patient in a care home becomes unwell, they tend to get admitted to a hospital. Why the scent of death was on Mrs McCann’s Bible also raises suspicions. Are we supposed to believe she took this Bible with her when she was at work? This question of attendance would be easy to check against surgery records. Has anyone knowledge of this? Possibly not, as it may be one of the confidential facts known only to police (British and Portugese). If it is found a lie, then along with the publicly available evidence, I imagine the case for trial and likely conviction is sealed, and only political interference blocks progress to trial. Which makes me wonder what political opportunities could arise to clear the way. A change in British and Portuguese government may not in themselves precipitate an action by the Portuguese police. It would take some kind of political will. I private prosecution is unlikely, unless Amaral or the residents of the unfortunate resort town Praia de Luz in Portugal take one against the McCanns for damages first.

Censored in the UK: Truth of the Lie

Censored in the UK mainstream television media: The McCann documentary they don't want you to see. Detective Amaral, investigator with the Portuguese police has shows compassion in presenting vital evidence concerning issues many people in the UK would like to be answered by the McCann family. Almost two years after Madeleine McCann allegedly died in the holiday apartment – as Gonçalo Amaral defends in his documentary – the investigators continue to have no doubt that the inquiry was affected by a contamination that was carried out intentionally by Kate and Gerry McCann, with one sole purpose: to conceal their daughter’s death. http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/05/mccanns-on-itvs-this-morning-show.html