Brown puts Israel lobbyist in charge of Britain's Middle East policy

Gordon Brown puts Israel lobbyist in charge of Britain's Middle East policy

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has appointed an Israeli agent of influence to a key position at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Britain’s foreign ministry.

On 9 June 2009, Ivan Lewis was given a major promotion in Mr Brown’s government when he was appointed Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office with responsibility for Middle East policy, Iraq, Iran, counterterrorism and Anglo-American relations.
Speaking after his promotion, Mr Lewis said: “My responsibility for the Middle East peace process is particularly poignant. I have never hidden my pride at being Jewish or my support for the State of Israel”.

Of course, there are experts in the Middle East, who have studied the languages, literature, culture, politics and history at British Universities; languages like Turkish and Arabic. Why bother with those, these days?

Bush 41, Clinton, Bush, Kissinger Under Close Guard

Bush 41, Clinton 42 and Bush 43 and US Chief Justice John Roberts were told that they would all be arrested if there was any further interference in the Settlements process. We were advised that heavy documentation is associated with this statement.

Criminal former President Bush 41 and his wife Barbara Pierce Bush (illegitimate daughter of the late British intelligence operative and Satanist, Aleister Crowley) were instructed by enforcement to ‘pack light’ (i.e. to place necessary clothes and toiletries only, in two small suitcases) so that they would be ready to be conveyed to jail at a moment’s notice.

•An unknown number of senior US Army and Air Force personnel were arrested during the week ending Friday 5th Jun

Dr Henry Kissinger has been and is being accompanied at all times by two Interpol agents with instructions to arrest him immediately and take him into high security custody, in the event that he attempts to intervene in the Settlements process. These agents are not for Kissinger’s protection.

24th May 2009, Bush 41’s passport was taken away from him

•President Obama, faced with the issuance of a Contempt of Court Writ by the World Court following a two-day extension granted on 1st June, which was the value date originally ‘agreed’, finally became ‘upset’ (the word used by our sources), and exerted himself against forces standing in the way of the Settlements process, given that the World Court proceedings could lead to the arrest of the President of the United States himself.

•We stress as follows:
ALL of the above intelligence has been RECONFIRMED TWICE by impeccable sources.

Finally, the criminal compartments, including we presume US Treasury operatives such as Timothy Geithner, the Bush and Clinton cadres, Leon Panetta and the ruthless fools inside the CIA and the rogue military elements, were, on 5th June, decisively rebuffed along the lines of (as it was put to us): ‘Who are you to destroy the American and world economies and to fling the American people into poverty?’. In other words, dare we say it, the message preached by this service and Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., has finally been accepted as realistic and sound – in the context of the ever more relentless thrashing that has been administered, and continues to be administered, to the criminal snakeheads who have tried to consolidate their hijacking of the whole of humanity in their lust to retain control of geomasonic Fraudulent Finance.

For more see:

http://www.worldreports.org/news/217_war_of_attrition_against_the_u.s._crime_cadres

information on José Manuel Barroso

Some background information on José Manuel Barroso and the 2005 ‘Snap’ Election.

“In 1999 José Manuel Barroso was elected president of his political party, PSD, Parliamentary elections in 2002 gave the PSD enough seats to form a coalition government with the right-wing Portuguese People's Party (led by onetime ‘O Independente’ editor and Defence Minister, Paulo Portas) and Barroso subsequently became Prime Minister of Portugal on 6 April 2002.

In 2004 Barroso left Santana Lopes, his second-in-command in the PSD to form a coalition government with the People's Party. Within months however, Lopes's charismatic and appealing yet deeply inexperienced leadership began to prove unpopular with his own party and party rivals. Concern was that the right-wing Popular Party (and junior coalition party) could gain even greater influence. The junior party's euroscepticism and tougher, more conservative policies on immigration and the EU proved something of an embarrassment to recently election EU president. It was, however, an approach that was to be catastrophic for the PSD and the People's Party. The recently elected president of the EU Commission deemed the increasing Eurosceptical approach of the PSD and the PP as potentially damaging and embarrassing. In December 2004, former Prime-Minister and recently elected EU President, Barroso used his constitutional powers and dismissed Lopes' coalition government after Lopes failed to uphold changes, supportive of the EU, on issues of defence and foreign affairs.

Incidentally, former Portuguese Prime Minister and EU President, Barroso played host to U.S President George W. Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Spanish Prime Minister José Maria Aznar in the Portuguese Island of Terceira, in the Azores, in which the four leaders met and finalised the controversial U.S-led 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Secrecy and suspicion shroud the 2009 elections for the next president of the European commission and the distribution of power between the European parties. It seems as though Hans Gert Pöttering wants to accelerate the process to enforce the Portuguese conservative’s re-election

McCann PJ Inspectors Accused

In the verdict read today, two PJ inspectors were accused, António Nunes Cardoso to document forgery and Gonçalo Amaral for simple false testimony, he was acquitted in relation to the crime of omission of denunciation of the aggressions suffered by Leonor Cipriano. The other three arguidos [defendants] were absolved of the crime of torture.

It wasn't proved who ordered the aggressions to Leonor Cipriano in 2004.

Gonçalo Amaral was sentenced to one year and six months of suspended sentence, and António Nunes Cardoso to two years and six months of suspended sentence also.

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/05/cirpriano-casepj-inspectors-accused-at.html

According to Amaral's view of the evidence, Madeleine McCann was killed in the apartment, and knowing that, the parents are implicated in the crime.

What is puzzling is the way the evidence points to the McCann parents, together with the obstacles to police investigation, and the immediate preparedness for a British-led campaign. The McCann parents were clearly acting on insider's advice from that moment onward.

And yet, no firm proof (even with discovery of a body, I doubt) that it was the McCann parents: There should be more, surely, even now. One fingerprint on the window: Someone else may have removed the body through the back door, and placed Kate's fingerprints on the window. Even the car evidence could be a frame, could it not? They may or may not have discovered their child dead. Someone in the Tapas9 could well know more, with sinister connections.

The accusations aimed at Gonzales Amacal appear to be a frame too, and linked to McCann's case. That's obvious. It may not be because of something Amacal knows and withholds, but simply because he doesn't say the parents killed Madeleine, merely that she died in the apartment and they know it.
More details of the trial procedure are needed in order to see what has happened today. I am mightily suprised at this. With what evidence has complicity by Amacal & co has been upheld?

Quite a number of people who point to political conspiracies, implicate the Queen of Britain, along with her position as a head of Freemasonry in Britain, but I suggest that's not so. Freemasons may well be involved, certainly.

Two years ago it was, I think, the Queen spoke obliquely to the effect that, 'we are living and dark times'. That's not referring to threats from abroad, jihadism or outrage at interference in sovereign lands by our forces, nor to the usual corruption within politics, or manipulations by media establishments. It refers, i understand, to the almost complete corruption of out political system from outside, whereby we cannot easily pursue the truth, to the detriment of the fabric of society. One glaring indication is the ongoing British Intelligence clean up, directed from the Palace, stretching to America, involving the massive fraud of the Settlements money and the financiaL crisis,   perpetrated by the Blair-Bush cabal. See http://www.worldreports.org/news/179_blair_has_rolled_over_to_avoid_arrest_and_jail